
The Surety Connection project is a multi-phased, multi-component project.
The project strives to address some fundamental issues faced by the surety
industry. These issues include expenses and losses continuing to mount,
risk capital exiting the market, and no new risk capital entering. For
the larger surety clients, the resulting situation is a lack of surety
capacity. The middle market clients experience a lack of underwriting flexibility.
Finally, the smaller and/or emerging surety clients have problems with
their market segment suffering under the highest severity of loss factors.
To confront these challenges the surety industry has invested significantly
in automation resources and increased the efficiency of their underwriting.
While these efforts will produce long term benefits, in the short run
they add to the expense of underwriting a surety portfolio. These efforts
do not address some very serious issues that surround increasing losses,
nor do they fully capitalize on the technological resources. The Surety Connection Project is an effort to restructure the way surety
is administered to reduce expenses, mitigate losses, and improve the
surety product itself making it a better alternative to products like
Subguard. Fundamental Challenges The surety industry is different now than it was just a decade ago.
The “back to basics” approach will not alter the outcome
or profitability of underwriting efforts. Technology has made impacts
that will not be reversed. The cooperation between owners, contractors
and subcontractors is becoming increasing more factual than friendly.
Armed with facts, disputes and resistance are more common, with the facts
being contested more than ever before. Sometimes it seems the construction
industry has evolved from a cooperative effort among contractors, to
a litigious group comprised more of attorneys and experts that argue
the facts, than contractors in the field. Attorneys and experts arguing,
do not build buildings, create infrastructure, or add value to any project.
Instead they decrease the efficiency, raise the costs, and increase the
risk to the contractor and their surety. Somehow the surety industry must capitalize on the efficiency automation
could provide. Automation would help reduce expense and improve the services
to the construction process that is not dependent on the legal system. Capitalizing on Technology The fundamental problems that the Surety Connection project strives
to answer are: Reduction of the costs to administer the implementation of the surety
program is achieved by employing technology. This takes advantage of
the vast amount of project information, not efficiently captured by the
surety. Reduction of the “blind” aspect of administering the maintenance
of the surety program is achieved by employing technology. This takes
advantage of the vast amount of project information, not efficiently
captured by the surety Mitigation of the loss exposure once information is available by creating
surety products that promote a constructive, cost effective construction
based resolution instead of a legally based one
Bid List Connection
A co-development project with a University partner to work with
public agencies to encourage them to post their projects on the internet,
or transmit their projects electronically with an open standards data
file that the surety industry could use to process the underwriting.
This will also help facilitate the delivery of an electronic bond. The
project data is managed by the contractor client and uploaded to the
surety agent and surety company. Surety Access Connection
A Microsoft Access based application that surety agents could use
to work with Bid List Connection. Project Status Connection
A co-development project with a University partner to extract project
data from a project owner’s internet site and provide the respective
surety will real time and aggregated data on specific projects. Surety Bridge Fund Connection
The development of a new surety product that eliminates one of
the most prevalent causes of contractor failure, the “unfunded
directive”, where contractors are forced to perform work that
the owner does not acknowledge as a charge order, but does acknowledge
needs to be performed. The policy is activated when a bonded contractor is faced with an unfunded
directive that could cause a significant drain on the cash flow reserves
of the contractor. It is often cited in the surety industry that most
contractors don’t fail, they run out of cash. By providing a tool
to bridge the financing in those situations, the contractor would be
able to perform the work efficiently and complete the project as efficiently
as possible. Taken together the Surety Connection Project is a group of components
that work to exploit the information that is available electronically.
The goal is to improve the cost effectiveness of the underwriting while
establishing a link between project and surety. That link then becomes
the loss mitigation tool in the event the project runs into difficultly.
The Surety Bridge Fund builds on that foundation to provide the real
loss mitigation tool, secured dispute financing.
|